BYD Atto 3 vs Hyundai IONIQ 6 SE Long Range: Which EV is better?
Head-to-head: BYD Atto 3 vs Hyundai IONIQ 6 SE Long Range. Compare real range, efficiency, charging time, price, rating and running costs to find the best electric vehicle for you in 2026.
Our verdict
Hyundai IONIQ 6 SE Long Range wins this head-to-head
It wins 6 of 8 categories compared below, with a margin of 5 category wins.
The numbers that matter
Real, comparable stats from our database. The green value wins each category.
| Specification | Atto 3 | IONIQ 6 SE Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Range IONIQ 6 SE Long Range wins | 420 km | 581 km |
| Battery IONIQ 6 SE Long Range wins | 60.5 kWh | 77.4 kWh |
| Efficiency IONIQ 6 SE Long Range wins | 15.5 kWh/100km | 13.3 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h IONIQ 6 SE Long Range wins | 7.3 s | 6.2 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% IONIQ 6 SE Long Range wins | ~35 min | ~18 min |
| Seats tie | 5 | 5 |
| Price Atto 3 wins | $30,000 | $44,950 |
| Rating IONIQ 6 SE Long Range wins | 4.3 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Est. running cost / yr | $349/yr | $299/yr |
View the full specification sheet
| Specification | Atto 3 | IONIQ 6 SE Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60.5 kWh (LFP Blade) | 77.4 kWh |
| Range | 420 km (WLTP) | 361 mi (EPA) |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 115 mph |
| Power | FWD · 201 hp | RWD · 225 hp |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3 s | — |
| Charging (10-80%) | ~35 min | ~18 min |
| Drive | FWD | — |
| Efficiency | 15.5 kWh/100 km | — |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Cargo | 440 L | — |
| V2L | Yes | — |
| 0-60 mph | — | 6.2 s |
| Architecture | — | 800V |
BYD Atto 3
Pros
- Great value
- Spacious interior
- Safe blade battery
- Comfortable ride
Cons
- Mediocre fast-charge speed
- Range drops at highway speed
- Some cheap trim plastics
- Sound system is average
Hyundai IONIQ 6 SE Long Range
Pros
- Outstanding efficiency
- Very fast 800V charging
- Comfortable ride
- Generous standard tech
Cons
- Tight rear headroom
- Small trunk opening
- Some cheap interior plastics
- No frunk
Frequently asked questions
Is the Hyundai IONIQ 6 SE Long Range really better than BYD Atto 3?
Our verdict is based on real specs: range, battery, efficiency, acceleration, charging speed, seats, price and rating. The winner wins the majority of those categories, but the right choice depends on your budget, driving style and priorities.
Which has more range, BYD Atto 3 or Hyundai IONIQ 6 SE Long Range?
420 km vs 581 km respectively, before factoring in weather and driving conditions.
Which is cheaper to run?
Based on official efficiency and a typical $0.15/kWh tariff at 15,000 km per year, running costs are estimated at $349/yr for the BYD Atto 3 and $299/yr for the Hyundai IONIQ 6 SE Long Range.
Should I compare more models?
Yes - add both models to our interactive comparator to see every spec side by side, or use the Which EV quiz to find more models that fit your budget and lifestyle.
Worth comparing next
Not sure which one is right for you?
Add these models to our interactive comparator and compare every spec side by side, or take the quiz to find even more matches.