BYD Atto 3 vs Xiaomi SU7 Ultra: Which EV is better?
Head-to-head: BYD Atto 3 vs Xiaomi SU7 Ultra. Compare real range, efficiency, charging time, price, rating and running costs to find the best electric vehicle for you in 2026.
Our verdict
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra wins this head-to-head
It wins 5 of 8 categories compared below, with a margin of 3 category wins.
The numbers that matter
Real, comparable stats from our database. The green value wins each category.
| Specification | Atto 3 | SU7 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Range SU7 Ultra wins | 420 km | 630 km |
| Battery SU7 Ultra wins | 60.5 kWh | 93.7 kWh |
| Efficiency Atto 3 wins | 15.5 kWh/100km | 16.4 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h SU7 Ultra wins | 7.3 s | 1.98 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% SU7 Ultra wins | ~35 min | ~25 min |
| Seats tie | 5 | 5 |
| Price Atto 3 wins | $30,000 | $82,400 |
| Rating SU7 Ultra wins | 4.3 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Est. running cost / yr | $349/yr | $369/yr |
View the full specification sheet
| Specification | Atto 3 | SU7 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60.5 kWh (LFP Blade) | 93.7 kWh |
| Range | 420 km (WLTP) | 630 km (CLTC) |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 350 km/h |
| Power | FWD · 201 hp | Tri-motor AWD · 1,548 hp |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3 s | 1.98 s |
| Charging (10-80%) | ~35 min | ~25 min (800V) |
| Drive | FWD | Tri-motor AWD |
| Efficiency | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Cargo | 440 L | 480 L |
| V2L | Yes | — |
BYD Atto 3
Pros
- Great value
- Spacious interior
- Safe blade battery
- Comfortable ride
Cons
- Mediocre fast-charge speed
- Range drops at highway speed
- Some cheap trim plastics
- Sound system is average
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra
Pros
- Ridiculous performance
- Track-ready hardware
- Practical cabin
- Very fast charging
Cons
- Very expensive
- Tri-motor drains power
- Young brand
- Tight rear headroom
Frequently asked questions
Is the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra really better than BYD Atto 3?
Our verdict is based on real specs: range, battery, efficiency, acceleration, charging speed, seats, price and rating. The winner wins the majority of those categories, but the right choice depends on your budget, driving style and priorities.
Which has more range, BYD Atto 3 or Xiaomi SU7 Ultra?
420 km vs 630 km respectively, before factoring in weather and driving conditions.
Which is cheaper to run?
Based on official efficiency and a typical $0.15/kWh tariff at 15,000 km per year, running costs are estimated at $349/yr for the BYD Atto 3 and $369/yr for the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra.
Should I compare more models?
Yes - add both models to our interactive comparator to see every spec side by side, or use the Which EV quiz to find more models that fit your budget and lifestyle.
Worth comparing next
Atto 3 vs U9
See who wins →
Atto 3 vs Taycan
See who wins →
Atto 3 vs Air Grand Touring
See who wins →
Not sure which one is right for you?
Add these models to our interactive comparator and compare every spec side by side, or take the quiz to find even more matches.