At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | City Pro 2023 | Phantom |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 64 km | 100 km |
| Battery | 0.7 kWh | 1.6 kWh |
| Efficiency | 1.1 kWh/100km | 1.6 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~0 min | ~0 min |
| Seats | 1 | 1 |
| Price | $1,399 | $2,500 |
| Rating | 4.4/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $25 | $36 |
The Phantom wins 3 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The City Pro 2023 is rated for 64 km of range versus 100 km for the Phantom. That is a difference of about 36 km, which matters most if you do regular long trips.
The City Pro 2023 consumes about 1.1 kWh per 100 km versus 1.6 kWh for the Phantom - so the City Pro 2023 is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Charging time depends on the charger and battery temperature; the lower 10-80% figure means shorter stops on long trips.
Space & comfort
The City Pro 2023 seats 1 and the Phantom seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The City Pro 2023 lists at $1,399 and the Phantom at $2,500. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $25/yr versus $36/yr.
Verdict
The Phantom is our pick, taking 3 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the longer range (64 km vs 100 km), the larger battery (0.7 kWh vs 1.6 kWh) and the higher rating (4.4/5 vs 4.5/5). That said, the City Pro 2023 is still the better buy if you are on a tighter budget (it is $1,101 cheaper), or you plan to keep it long-term (roughly $11/yr cheaper to run).