At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | City Pro 2023 | GT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 64 km | 90 km |
| Battery | 0.7 kWh | 1.5 kWh |
| Efficiency | 1.1 kWh/100km | 1.7 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~0 min | ~0 min |
| Seats | 1 | 1 |
| Price | $1,399 | $3,000 |
| Rating | 4.4/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $25 | $38 |
The GT2 wins 3 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The City Pro 2023 is rated for 64 km of range versus 90 km for the GT2. That is effectively a tie - neither offers a meaningful range advantage.
The City Pro 2023 consumes about 1.1 kWh per 100 km versus 1.7 kWh for the GT2 - so the City Pro 2023 is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Charging time depends on the charger and battery temperature; the lower 10-80% figure means shorter stops on long trips.
Space & comfort
The City Pro 2023 seats 1 and the GT2 seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The City Pro 2023 lists at $1,399 and the GT2 at $3,000. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $25/yr versus $38/yr.
Verdict
The GT2 is our pick, taking 3 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the longer range (64 km vs 90 km), the larger battery (0.7 kWh vs 1.5 kWh) and the higher rating (4.4/5 vs 4.5/5). That said, the City Pro 2023 is still the better buy if you are on a tighter budget (it is $1,601 cheaper), or you plan to keep it long-term (roughly $13/yr cheaper to run).