Inokim OX vs Apollo Phantom: Which EV is better?
Head-to-head: Inokim OX vs Apollo Phantom. Compare real range, efficiency, charging time, price, rating and running costs to find the best electric vehicle for you in 2026.
Our verdict
Apollo Phantom wins this head-to-head
It wins 5 of 8 categories compared below, with a margin of 5 category wins.
The numbers that matter
Real, comparable stats from our database. The green value wins each category.
| Specification | OX | Phantom |
|---|---|---|
| Range Phantom wins | 72 km | 100 km |
| Battery Phantom wins | 1.2 kWh | 1.6 kWh |
| Efficiency Phantom wins | 1.7 kWh/100km | 1.6 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~0 min | ~0 min |
| Seats tie | 1 | 1 |
| Price Phantom wins | $3,000 | $2,500 |
| Rating Phantom wins | 4.4 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Est. running cost / yr | $38/yr | $36/yr |
View the full specification sheet
| Specification | OX | Phantom |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 1240 Wh | 1584 Wh |
| Range | 45 mi | 62 mi |
| Top speed | 34 mph | 38 mph |
| Power | 700W (1200W peak) | 2x1000W peak |
| Max load | 265 lb | 330 lb |
| Weight | 60 lb | 77 lb |
| Charging time | ~8 h | ~10 h |
| Suspension | Front + rear springs | Adjustable front + rear |
| Brakes | — | Hydraulic disc |
Inokim OX
Pros
- Superb build quality
- Plush ride
- Long range
- Easy to service
Cons
- Expensive
- Slow charging
- Heavy
- Basic display
Apollo Phantom
Pros
- Fast and powerful
- Hydraulic brakes
- Long range
- Adjustable ride
Cons
- Heavy
- Expensive
- Slow charging
- Firm at top speed
Frequently asked questions
Is the Apollo Phantom really better than Inokim OX?
Our verdict is based on real specs: range, battery, efficiency, acceleration, charging speed, seats, price and rating. The winner wins the majority of those categories, but the right choice depends on your budget, driving style and priorities.
Which has more range, Inokim OX or Apollo Phantom?
72 km vs 100 km respectively, before factoring in weather and driving conditions.
Which is cheaper to run?
Based on official efficiency and a typical $0.15/kWh tariff at 15,000 km per year, running costs are estimated at $38/yr for the Inokim OX and $36/yr for the Apollo Phantom.
Should I compare more models?
Yes - add both models to our interactive comparator to see every spec side by side, or use the Which EV quiz to find more models that fit your budget and lifestyle.
Worth comparing next
Not sure which one is right for you?
Add these models to our interactive comparator and compare every spec side by side, or take the quiz to find even more matches.