At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | Model 3 Long Range | R1T |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 549 km | 566 km |
| Battery | 82 kWh | 135 kWh |
| Efficiency | 14.9 kWh/100km | 24.9 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.2 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~22 min | ~40 min |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Price | $44,990 | $70,000 |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.6/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $335 | $560 |
Both models win 3 of 8 categories - the decision comes down to your priorities.
Range & efficiency
The Model 3 Long Range is rated for 549 km of range versus 566 km for the R1T. That is effectively a tie - neither offers a meaningful range advantage.
The Model 3 Long Range consumes about 14.9 kWh per 100 km versus 24.9 kWh for the R1T - so the Model 3 Long Range is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
The Model 3 Long Range reaches 100 km/h in 4.2 seconds versus 3.2 for the R1T. R1T is the quicker car, though real-world feel also depends on power delivery and weight.
Charging
Fast charging from 10-80% takes about 22 minutes in the Model 3 Long Range and 40 minutes in the R1T. Model 3 Long Range spends less time at the plug on road trips.
Space & comfort
The Model 3 Long Range seats 5 and the R1T seats 5. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The Model 3 Long Range lists at $44,990 and the R1T at $70,000. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $335/yr versus $560/yr.
Verdict
It is genuinely close - both models win 3 of 8 categories each. Pick the Model 3 Long Range if you value faster charging (10-80% in ~22 min), better efficiency (14.9 kWh/100km). Pick the R1T if you value longer range (566 km), quicker acceleration (0-100 in 3.2 s). Either way, you are getting one of the best options in its class.