At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | IONIQ 6 SE Long Range | R1T |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 581 km | 566 km |
| Battery | 77.4 kWh | 135 kWh |
| Efficiency | 13.3 kWh/100km | 24.9 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2 s | 3.2 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~18 min | ~40 min |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Price | $44,950 | $70,000 |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.6/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $299 | $560 |
The IONIQ 6 SE Long Range wins 4 of 8 categories, making it our pick in this head-to-head.
Range & efficiency
The IONIQ 6 SE Long Range is rated for 581 km of range versus 566 km for the R1T. That is effectively a tie - neither offers a meaningful range advantage.
The IONIQ 6 SE Long Range consumes about 13.3 kWh per 100 km versus 24.9 kWh for the R1T - so the IONIQ 6 SE Long Range is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
The IONIQ 6 SE Long Range reaches 100 km/h in 6.2 seconds versus 3.2 for the R1T. R1T is the quicker car, though real-world feel also depends on power delivery and weight.
Charging
Fast charging from 10-80% takes about 18 minutes in the IONIQ 6 SE Long Range and 40 minutes in the R1T. IONIQ 6 SE Long Range spends less time at the plug on road trips.
Space & comfort
The IONIQ 6 SE Long Range seats 5 and the R1T seats 5. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The IONIQ 6 SE Long Range lists at $44,950 and the R1T at $70,000. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $299/yr versus $560/yr.
Verdict
The IONIQ 6 SE Long Range is our pick, taking 4 of 8 categories in this head-to-head. It leads on the longer range (581 km vs 566 km), the lower consumption (13.3 kWh/100km vs 24.9 kWh/100km) and the faster 10-80% charging (~18 min vs ~40 min). That said, the R1T is still the better buy if driving dynamics are your priority (quicker 0-100 in 3.2 s), or you need the extra cargo space (1000 L vs 0 L).