At a glance
Here is how the two models stack up on the specs that matter most.
| Specification | CE 04 | Experia |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 130 km | 420 km |
| Battery | 8.9 kWh | 22.5 kWh |
| Efficiency | 6.8 kWh/100km | 5.4 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h | 0 s | 0 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% | ~0 min | ~40 min |
| Seats | 2 | 1 |
| Price | $16,000 | $25,880 |
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Estimated running cost / year | $153 | $122 |
Both models win 3 of 8 categories - the decision comes down to your priorities.
Range & efficiency
The CE 04 is rated for 130 km of range versus 420 km for the Experia. That is a difference of about 290 km, which matters most if you do regular long trips.
The CE 04 consumes about 6.8 kWh per 100 km versus 5.4 kWh for the Experia - so the Experia is the cheaper and greener option per kilometre.
Performance
Acceleration figures vary by trim; check the full spec sheet below for the exact variant tested.
Charging
Charging time depends on the charger and battery temperature; the lower 10-80% figure means shorter stops on long trips.
Space & comfort
The CE 04 seats 2 and the Experia seats 1. Check the full spec sheet for cargo volume.
Price & running costs
The CE 04 lists at $16,000 and the Experia at $25,880. At 15,000 km per year, estimated running costs are about $153/yr versus $122/yr.
Verdict
It is genuinely close - both models win 3 of 8 categories each. Pick the CE 04 if you value more seats (2). Pick the Experia if you value longer range (420 km), better efficiency (5.4 kWh/100km). Either way, you are getting one of the best options in its class.