Fangchengbao Bao 5 vs Yangwang U9: Which EV is better?
Head-to-head: Fangchengbao Bao 5 vs Yangwang U9. Compare real range, efficiency, charging time, price, rating and running costs to find the best electric vehicle for you in 2026.
The numbers that matter
Real, comparable stats from our database. The green value wins each category.
| Specification | Bao 5 | U9 |
|---|---|---|
| Range Bao 5 wins | 505 km | 450 km |
| Battery Bao 5 wins | 82.5 kWh | 80 kWh |
| Efficiency U9 wins | 19.5 kWh/100km | 18.7 kWh/100km |
| 0-100 km/h U9 wins | 4.8 s | 2.36 s |
| Fast charge 10-80% U9 wins | ~30 min | ~25 min |
| Seats Bao 5 wins | 5 | 2 |
| Price Bao 5 wins | $52,000 | $168,000 |
| Rating U9 wins | 4.5 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Est. running cost / yr | $439/yr | $421/yr |
View the full specification sheet
| Specification | Bao 5 | U9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 82.5 kWh | 80 kWh |
| Range | 505 km (CLTC) | 450 km (CLTC) |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 309 km/h |
| Power | AWD · 505 hp | Quad-motor AWD · 1,305 hp |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8 s | 2.36 s |
| Charging (10-80%) | ~30 min | ~25 min |
| Drive | Dual motor AWD | Quad-motor AWD |
| Efficiency | 19.5 kWh/100 km | 18.7 kWh/100 km |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Cargo | 520 L | 100 L |
Fangchengbao Bao 5
Pros
- Serious off-road hardware
- Tough styling
- Strong performance
- Good value
Cons
- Not exported widely
- Heavy
- Average charging speed
- Firm ride
Yangwang U9
Pros
- Insane acceleration
- Four-wheel torque vectoring
- Supercar presence
- BYD build quality
Cons
- Very expensive
- Limited range
- Two seats only
- Brand unknown outside China
Frequently asked questions
Is the really better than Fangchengbao Bao 5?
Our verdict is based on real specs: range, battery, efficiency, acceleration, charging speed, seats, price and rating. The winner wins the majority of those categories, but the right choice depends on your budget, driving style and priorities.
Which has more range, Fangchengbao Bao 5 or Yangwang U9?
505 km vs 450 km respectively, before factoring in weather and driving conditions.
Which is cheaper to run?
Based on official efficiency and a typical $0.15/kWh tariff at 15,000 km per year, running costs are estimated at $439/yr for the Fangchengbao Bao 5 and $421/yr for the Yangwang U9.
Should I compare more models?
Yes - add both models to our interactive comparator to see every spec side by side, or use the Which EV quiz to find more models that fit your budget and lifestyle.
Worth comparing next
Bao 5 vs SU7 Ultra
See who wins →
Bao 5 vs Taycan
See who wins →
Bao 5 vs Air Grand Touring
See who wins →
Not sure which one is right for you?
Add these models to our interactive comparator and compare every spec side by side, or take the quiz to find even more matches.